Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 




      :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] RE: 8bits vs. 16bits/channel: cantheeyeseethedifference

> -----Original Message-----
> From: filmscanners_owner@halftone.co.uk
> [mailto:filmscanners_owner@halftone.co.uk] On Behalf Of
> Austin Franklin
> Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 6:52 PM
> To: frankparis@comcast.net
> Subject: [filmscanners] RE: 8bits vs. 16bits/channel: can
> theeyeseethedifference
> Hi Frank,
> >That's what PS
> > actually does? Of course that IS dithering, not aliasing.
> But it doesn't do that.  It simply chops off the lower 8
> bits.  That is not dithering or aliasing.  Converting 0x1234
> to 8 bits is simply 0x12.

Hmmm. We seem to have a disagreement here. I wonder who is right?

> Now, if you are processing some data, and have to "split the
> difference", happening to arrive at 127.5, that is
> quantization error, not dithering.

True, if that's what PS does. The other guy seems to disagree with you,

Frank Paris

Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 


Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.