ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] RE: DSLRs, film scans and color (was: is this about as good asitgets?)



Paul D. writes ...

> > From: michael shaffer
> >
> >   In the context of scanning film versus DSLRs, you need
> > to define the acquired color additionally with respect to
> > "gamut".  That is, you may be getting accurate color,
> > but are you acquiring ^all^ the colors.
>  ...
>
> I don't think that film necessarily has a larger gamut than digicams. ...

  I would have thought as much ... but, aside from the characteristics of
some Dcams versus better Dcams, why are untagged JPEGs no better than
sRGB???  That is, if you open them into PS, and then assign any variety of
working spaces, the gamuts which "look best" are associated with Colormatch
and sRGB(???) [... speaking from my own experience with my own 2yo Coolpix,
and having no experience with the current lot of Dcams ...]

cheerios ... shAf  :o)
Avalon Peninsula, Newfoundland
www.micro-investigations.com (in progress)


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.