Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

   


   


   















      :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: Canon IDs vs Pentax 67II



There have been quite a few less biased analysis than the crusade
luminous-landscape has been on for about 2 years. One of the better ones I
have linked at my work machine (photog doesn't YET pay all the bills :-( )
and I'll repost it later this PM.  Essentially what the person did was to
shoot a highly detailed landscape on film vs digital camera, and zoom in on
particularly high details of each image and look at the results.  His
conclusions are that 16mpixels in a 35mm format are equivilant to the best
grain resolution - something the 1Ds approaches but doesn't reach.

Some other ways of making comparisons:

1) take the film image,  enlarge it via standard 'wet chem' methods using
the best equip you can find.  - scan the result at the highest resolution
you can
2) compare the 1Ds output, similarly enlarged, to the result.

Film still wins - just don't tell Luminous Landscape.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Nagaraj, Ramesh" <Ramesh.Nagaraj@ca.com>
To: <karlsch@earthlink.net>
Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 6:40 AM
Subject: [filmscanners] RE: Canon IDs vs Pentax 67II



Andre wrote:

> This one will spark heated debate...
>
> http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/shootout.shtml
>

I am not a professional and have not done any tests, but heard & read about
this.
There has been a great deal of discussion going on about same article in
Pentax Discussion Mailing List.
I agree with the some of PDML members that this is comparison of Scanner v/s
Digital Camera.

I am curious to know about other ways of comparing the DSLRs and Film/slide.
I think you can compare them both
theorically and practically (means comparing the output. Example: Print).

In "practical" way of comparing, out put from DSLR and Film/Slide are
converted to some other form(Print) and then
compared. This is not a direct comparison of DSLR v/s Film/Slide. Other than
using print as for comparison,
I do not know any other (experimental)way of comparing it.






Thanks
Ramesh
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title
or body

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title
or body

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.