Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[filmscanners] Re: CO2
Actually, I haven't noticed NO has much of a taste, but I wouldn't call
it "tasteless" ;-)
I better close my mouth and hold my breath before I get myself into some
trouble.... ;-)
Art
Preben S. Kristensen wrote:
> Sorry Art, my mess crossed yours - two souls, same funny taste!
>
> Preben
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Arthur Entlich" <artistic-1@shaw.ca>
> To: <krille@tin.it>
> Sent: Friday, January 24, 2003 2:29 PM
> Subject: [filmscanners] Re: CO2
>
>
> Personally, I prefer Nitrous Oxide (just say NO?), it may not clean your
> film, but it sure seems to make the dust seem funny....
>
> ;-)
>
> Art
>
>
> Jerry M. Pine wrote:
>
>
>>Is there any reason that using CO2 is superior to using compressed
>>
> Nitrogen
>
>>cylinders?
>>
>>Nitrogen is an inert substance and is a major component of air (about
>>
> 80%).
>
>>---
>>Jerry M. Pine
>>San Jose, CA
>>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or
body
|
