ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: Nikon LS-4000ED Depth of Field Revisited



golder@netzero.com wrote:
> 2. Secondarily, I think it would be helpful to try and identify if
> the dof problems that have been reported over the last few years are
> model-specific or generally characteristic of the whole Nikon
> filmscanner line....

I think they are also individual-scanner-specific -- that is, there is
variation in the accuracy of alignment of individual scanners and film
holders, at least among scanners of the LS-30/LS-2000 generation.

It's good to hear your results with the LS-4000. I look forward to
other reports...

Peter Marquis-Kyle
Generally satisfied LS-30 user


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.