ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: Newish Digital Tech



But wouldn't the same 'smallness' apply to quantum/heat effect driven noise?
The smaller the capture unit, the more units will capture a particular heat
generated event.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Paul D. DeRocco" <pderocco@ix.netcom.com>
To: <karlsch@earthlink.net>
Sent: Saturday, January 18, 2003 12:01 AM
Subject: [filmscanners] RE: Newish Digital Tech


> From: Karl Schulmeisters
>
> I would contend that the noise most distracting in digicams, sources from
> the support and amplification electronics - and the quantum
> tunneling within
> the devices themselves, which makes the 'efficiency' arguement somewhat
> moot.

What leads me to believe that the limiting factor is the actual photon shot
noise is that there appears to be a correlation between the noise level of a
CCD and the smallness of its pixels.

--

Ciao,               Paul D. DeRocco
Paul                mailto:pderocco@ix.netcom.com

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title
or body

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.