Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

   


   


   















      :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: digital artifacting




"Arthur Entlich" <artistic-1@shaw.ca> wrote:
David J. Littleboy wrote:
> Scan provia at 4000 dpi. Crop out 2000x3000 pixles. Now aim your D60 at
the
> same subject, but compose so that the 2000x3000 pixel crop fills the
frame.
> Compare those. When I do that, the D60 looks better.

>>>>>>>>>>>>
This seems like a pretty odd way of comparing things.
<<<<<<<<<<<<

That's the point. I've seen too many people say "a 35mm frame has 24MP of
data", assuming that 4000dpi scanned pixels are one-to-one comparable to
digital pixels.

That's all. I'd like a more concise, more easily understood way of saying
it, though...

David J. Littleboy
davidjl@gol.com
Tokyo, Japan

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.