Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

   


   


   















      :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] RE: Newish Digital Tech



> From: Austin Franklin
>
> What ever the number is, it's a "so what" though...red herring as it were.
> The Bayer pattern sensor is only designed to sense the light of a
> particular
> color at a certain spatial point.  Images from Bayer pattern
> imaging sensors
> have not shown to be inferior to those of scanning cameras, or the Foveon,
> with respect to same sensor area comparisons. Typically, scanning cameras
> will be better as they have a much higher resolution.

The point is that the more photons you capture, the less noise you get.
Assuming the Foveon wastes the same percentage of its area on interconnect
as a Bayer pattern chip, the Bayer chip will filter out all the "wrong"
color photons that hit each sensor, while the Foveon will actually use them.

Obviously, implementation matters. But I see no reason to expect that a
Bayer pattern chip is intrinsically better--it's just been worked on longer.

--

Ciao,               Paul D. DeRocco
Paul                mailto:pderocco@ix.netcom.com


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.