Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 




      :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] RE: Newish Digital Tech

Hi Robert,

> Scanners often use either three rows of CCDs each sensitive to a different
> color or three different light sources. Therefore you will get the full
> color information for each pixel. While a few digital (video) cameras also
> use a three CCD approach most of them use just one CCD with a
> color pattern.
> Therefore, you won't get the full color information for each spatial
> location.

True, but it's the significance of this loss in point spatial information
that is at question for me.  I believe it is barely significant, and the
images from the new high sensor count cameras certainly are convincing.

> This is different with the X3 sensor.

I am not convinced that the architecture does this %100 as you suggest...

> Nevertheless, it is
> questionable how well that approach works. I would think there
> might be some
> serious problems with color seperation, sensitivity, noise, etc. I wish
> these guys good 'luck' though

As do I....but...

> because if they can solve these problems it
> might be a great solution for all of us.

What problem does it solve?  I am not convinced it solves any significant
problem...and that there are issues beyond what you suggest.



Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 


Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.