Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

   


   


   















      :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: [filmscanners_Digest] filmscanners Digest for Wed 11 Dec, 2002


  • To: lexa@lexa.ru
  • Subject: [filmscanners] Re: [filmscanners_Digest] filmscanners Digest for Wed 11 Dec, 2002
  • From: "Bruce" <smthopr@earthlink.net>
  • Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 17:22:35 -0800
  • In-reply-to: <200212101659.18lVdx2st3NZFnx0@emu>
  • Unsubscribe: mailto:listserver@halftone.co.uk

on 12/10/2002 4:00 PM, filmscanners_Digest_owner@halftone.co.uk at
filmscanners_Digest_owner@halftone.co.uk wrote:

> You say, "Since I've been using my ls-8000 and shooting 6x9 I have become a
> little dissatisfied with my 35 images;" but it is unclear if this
> dissatisfaction stems from the particular scanner you are using for the 6x9
> versus the scanner you used to scan the 35mm or is contingent on the size of
> the film format or on the outcome of the printing process itself.

I scan both formats on the same scanner, at the same resolution. Thus it is
contingent on the size of the film format.

-Bruce

Visit my website at:
http://home.earthlink.net/~smthopr

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.