ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] RE: Best graphics evaluation PC monitor



Barco has a good reputation for color accuracy, but last I looked they
couldn't handle super high resolutions.

As to profiling, don't reject a monitor because it doesn't have built-in
calibration. Aftermarket calibration works fine.

You should also be careful about the video card you buy. Personally, I like
the Matrox ones, because they have excellent, glitch-free DACs, and support
high resolutions at high scan rates.

--

Ciao,               Paul D. DeRocco
Paul                mailto:pderocco@ix.netcom.com

> From: Alex Zabrovsky
>
> My company intends to purchase a quality PC monitor for to be used at the
> image processing station for image quality evaluation (generated
> by digital
> still cameras and scanners).
> I was asked to research the field and provide my recommendations for that.
> I've heard one of the best, professional monitors are Lacie, however there
> must be others as well which I haven't heard yet. As far as remember Lacie
> comes with built-in hardware calibration utility which can be
> hooked up to a
> PC via USB for calibration (profiling).
>
> Any opinions/suggestions are welcome.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.