ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] RE: understanding contaminated blacks--SS4000--newbietype question



If this is merely a variation in the black point for the three colors, it
should be possible to compensate for, more or less, by setting the black
point independently for the R, G and B channels in either Levels or Curves.

--

Ciao,               Paul D. DeRocco
Paul                mailto:pderocco@ix.netcom.com

> From: Anthony Atkielski
>
> I think that this is a result of the very limited headroom
> available in deep
> shadows on the film.  As the luminosity and exposure drop, the differences
> in sensitivity between different colors on the film become more and more
> obvious, and the color balance shifts dramatically.  What you are
> seeing is
> a tendency for the color to shift as exposure drops to zero.  Every film
> I've scanned shows this to some extent, and usually the color that stands
> out is green (i.e., the deep shadows are "contaminated" by green).
>
> It's very difficult to create a film with absolutely linear response to
> color for all possible exposures; the colors always shift a
> little depending
> on the exact amount of light a given spot receives.  For the extreme
> highlights and shadows, the shift gets pretty big.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.