ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] RE: Scanning with too much resolution? (was:PS sharpening...)



> From: Julian Vrieslander
>
> I think, perhaps, you meant
>
> "... may not be able to reproduce the original details correctly, ..."
>
> or, at least, that wording makes more sense to me.

No, what I meant is that instead of making each pixel the average of the
entire area it represents, it may instead be taking a sample of a smaller
point. This would mean that a block of pixels would be sampling a block of
discontiguous small points, and ignoring the light between them. This has
the effect of taking finer detail and aliasing it down.

> Yes.  But what I found most surprising about the example images
> in Margulis'
> book, was that the image scanned at the lower sampling rate appeared to be
> sharper, and not just in the areas of texture, like the grass.
> Try viewing
> these images with Acrobat set to display at 200% zoom.  Look at the white
> straps and the hems around the edge of the horse blanket.  In the image
> scanned at low res, the lines are rough from pixellation, but
> they have good
> definition.  In the the high res, downsampled scan, the lines are
> smoother,
> but less sharp.

Is this an e-book or something? Or are the images online somewhere for free?

--

Ciao,               Paul D. DeRocco
Paul                mailto:pderocco@ix.netcom.com

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.