ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] RE: dpi - formerly PS sharpening



Just changing the dpi number doesn't change the size of the file; it changes
the size (in inches) of the image. It's really quite simple: an image file
contains a certain number of pixels. It also contains a number that tells
how many dots per inch it supposedly is. Programs are free to obey it or
ignore it. Web browsers ignore it.

--

Ciao,               Paul D. DeRocco
Paul                mailto:pderocco@ix.netcom.com

> From: filmscanners_owner@halftone.co.uk
>
> Anthony, your comments concerning dpi raised a few questions for me.  I
> understand why leaving the dpi at the scanner resolution can
> slightly deter
> theft from those who wouldn't know how to change the size of the
> image.  By
> leaving the dpi at 2700 or 4000, is the file size larger than it
> would be at
> 72dpi?  If so, I can see a distinct advantage to reducing the dpi to 72.
> Also, by leaving the dpi at 2700 or 4000 are you creating a higher quality
> graphic file? If so, than that will give the final user the ability to
> create better reproductions.  Wouldn't that overcome the theft
> advantage of
> leaving the image at 2700 or 4000 dpi.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.