ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] RE: PS sharpening



It may produce better results--I don't know, not having compared. However, I
do know that upsampling in repeated small increments works a bit better than
one large upsampling step.

--

Ciao,               Paul D. DeRocco
Paul                mailto:pderocco@ix.netcom.com

> From: Robert Meier
>
> > Then "Image - Image Size" - change the resolution to 1/2 of the
> > Resolution
> > shown, readjust the Document Size to what you want, click OK.
> > It will be
> > downsampled by 1/2.
> >
> > Continue doing this until the Resolution is what you desire.
>
> Excuse my ignorance but what is the logic doing it this way instead of
> resample it directly to the resolution you want?

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.