ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] RE: IV ED dynamic range... DYNAMIC RANGE!



Hi Arthur,

> Based upon the "discussion" which occurred here recently regarding the
> use of "density range", "dynamic range", etc., it seems fairly hopeless.
>
> Partially speaking, this is because there have not been agreed upon
> definitions or standards within the industry.

Actually, that's not true.  They are VERY standard within certain specific
engineering areas...unfortunately, it's marketing, and people who don't
understand (and not all engineers...and people who have an engineering title
but aren't really "engineers"...understand this...) this...

I believe the term "density range" is quite strait forward...but I must
admit, the  term "dynamic range" sounds a lot cooler ;-)

Regards,

Austin

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.