ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: VueScan vs. SilverFast with negs



It's often helpful to first change to LAB, and then apply Colin's 'S' curve
correction in the L channel only - that way the colors won't be modified.

Maris

----- Original Message -----
From: "Colin Maddock" <cmaddock@clear.net.nz>
To: <mlidaka@ameritech.net>
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 2:44 AM
Subject: [filmscanners] Re: VueScan vs. SilverFast with negs


Petru said:
>- VueScan - as I said I have only used it for a few times, mainly to try
>to compare the results with the SF scans. In general I got very flat
>images, even after adjusting the levels in PS the scans were still a
>little too flat for my taste.

After you have levels adjusted to your satisfaction, just apply some 'S'
correction in Curves. Clamp the mid-point and drag the levels below that
down and the levels above the mid-point up, until you have the desired
amount of punch in the image.

Colin Maddock



----------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title
or body


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.