Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

   


   


   















      :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] RE: Slide flatness


  • To: lexa@www.lexa.ru
  • Subject: [filmscanners] RE: Slide flatness
  • From: "Kapetanakis, Constantine" <KAPETAC@polaroid.com>
  • Date: Thu, 23 May 2002 08:04:28 -0400
  • Unsubscribe: mailto:listserver@halftone.co.uk

The polaroid ss4000 and ss4000+ will have no problem handling your slides. I
've heard the Nikon depth of field is not that good.

-----Original Message-----
From: al@greenspace.freeserve.co.uk [mailto:al@greenspace.freeserve.co.uk]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 6:06 PM
To: KAPETAC@polaroid.com
Subject: [filmscanners] Slide flatness


Most of my slides have been through a projector and have "popped" in the
process.  I
assume that they never go back quite as flat.  Is this right?

I'm still toying with getting a Coolscan 4000 and I wonder whether this
might take the
plane of the film outside the DOF of the scanner.  Anyone had any experience
of whether
there is a difference in scanning slides before and after projection?

I guess the ideal workflow would be to scan newly processed slides before
projection (or
glass-mount them which I'd rather not do).



Al Bond

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title
or body

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.