Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 




      :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: Flatbeds for 6x6 negs.

** Reply to note from filmscanners@halftone.co.uk Tue, 21 May 2002 08:03:25 

> I agree as well. We have a Umax Powerlock III in the lab and are using it
> as an intergral part of a piece of test equipment for measuring film
> resolution/MTFetc. Good choice


Everyone with Umax Powerlook III seems happy.  The reason I was finding the
Epson 1680 more interesting is that is does 1600x3200 dpi as opposed to the
Umax 1200x2400.

Will that extra resolution of the Epson transfer anything from the negative
to the electronic image or will it just generate more noise?


Charles Christacopoulos, Management Information Officer,
Planning & Information Group, University of Dundee, Dundee DD1 4HN,
Scotland, United Kingdom.
Tel: 44(0)1382-344891. Fax: 44(0)1382-201604.
http://www.somis.dundee.ac.uk/ http://somis2.ais.dundee.ac.uk/

Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 


Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.