At 11:10 AM 5/15/2002 -0400, Austin wrote:
>That is not correct. Partial reconstruction, only frequency, yes, but not
>complete by any means. You do not get any guarantee of accurate amplitude
>reconstruction with 2xf, nor do you know what the waveform was.
As I understand the Nyquist Theorem, 2f is the _minimum_ frequency needed
to reconstruct the waveform. Are you saying that the theorem has been
disproven, or that technical considerations make it impossible to achieve
the theoretical results? Or something else?
Stan
================================
Photography by Stan McQueen
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or
body
