Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 




      :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: 3 year wait

> >>is
> >>indistinguishable from the original, projected side by side at
> >>approx 6 feet wide.
> >>
> >
> > Understood, and I'd say you're probably %100 right, but that's projection,
> > which really doesn't allow for the most critical viewing.  Now, not that
> > that doesn't work perfectly for some applications, that's not in question.
> >
> Yes, that can be the "rub"... If you are using Kodak projection lenses,
> you might as well be shooting through "Vaseline" coated lenses.
> I was amazed what I discovered in projection settings once I sprang for
> some Navitar Gold lenses.  I have never quite understood this, quite
> honestly.  We pay a minor fortune on top quality 35mm lenses for our
> cameras and then project the slide results with lenses from the "dark
> ages" (excuse the pun)...

Note that I also compared with loupe on light table.

           Mac McDougald -- DOOGLE DIGITAL
  500 Prestwick Ridge Way # 39 - Knoxville, TN 37919
 doogle@doogle.com  865-540-1308  http://www.doogle.com

Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 


Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.