Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

   


   


   















      :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] RE: 3 year wait


  • To: lexa@www.lexa.ru
  • Subject: [filmscanners] RE: 3 year wait
  • From: "Kapetanakis, Constantine" <KAPETAC@polaroid.com>
  • Date: Fri, 10 May 2002 14:16:05 -0400
  • Unsubscribe: mailto:listserver@halftone.co.uk

It did take me a while but the ccd part number the ss4000+ is  ILX718K . It
is a sony ccd. I am not sure about the microtek scanner but it should have
the same ccd. Of course firmware, calibration and application software are
all different between them.
You will notice that the actual pixels of the ccd itself are 5363. As i
stated earlier we are using 5340 in the scanner itself.
I hope this answers your question.

-----Original Message-----
From: Austin Franklin [mailto:darkroom@ix.netcom.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 8:12 PM
To: KAPETAC@polaroid.com
Subject: [filmscanners] RE: 3 year wait


Thanks Philip,  I hope Constantine comes back with the part number for the
sensor.  It would be interesting to know...and it's even more interesting,
Polaroid using a Kodak sensor...there is a certain irony in that, as
Polaroid "invented" instant imaging ;-)

Austin

> The Microtek 4000 tf aka Polaroid 4000+ states a Kodak CCD. This is in
> Microtek's PDF brochure.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Austin Franklin" <darkroom@ix.netcom.com>
> To: <philip.elkin@virgin.net>
> Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 9:31 PM
> Subject: [filmscanners] RE: 3 year wait
>
>
> Constantine,
>
> I didn't expect it was a Kodak sensor.  The spec for the SS4k+
> specifically
> SAYS it's a 4k sensor...(actually it says it's 12k, but tri-linear, which
> makes it 4k).  What is the actual part number of the sensor?
>
> BTW, get your marketing/spec wonks to understand what the heck a
> "pixel" is
> and how it differs from a "sensor element" (sensel?) ;-)
>
> Austin
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: filmscanners_owner@halftone.co.uk
> > [mailto:filmscanners_owner@halftone.co.uk]On Behalf Of Kapetanakis,
> > Constantine
> > Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 4:01 PM
> > To: darkroom@ix.netcom.com
> > Subject: [filmscanners] RE: 3 year wait
> >
> >
> > I work for Polaroid. And the sensor is not Kodak model but Sony
> > if i am not
> > mistaken. An excellent choice.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Austin Franklin [mailto:darkroom@ix.netcom.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 2:45 PM
> > To: KAPETAC@polaroid.com
> > Subject: [filmscanners] RE: 3 year wait
> >
> >
> > Constantine,
> >
> > You must have specs for that unit that I don't have.  Where did
> > you get that
> > information from?
> >
> > According to the spec for the SS4k+ I have, they call it a 12k
> > *PIXEL* CCD,
> > but that simply isn't true, it's a 12k tri-linear *SENSOR* CCD,
> and three
> > sensors give the color information required for a color pixel,
> > and therefore
> > it really is a 4k PIXEL CCD.
> >
> > When Kodak says 10k, they mean 10k across, whether it's one
> > sensor array, or
> > a tri-linear array.
> >
> > Where's David when ya need him ;-)
> >
> > Austin
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: filmscanners_owner@halftone.co.uk
> > > [mailto:filmscanners_owner@halftone.co.uk]On Behalf Of Kapetanakis,
> > > Constantine
> > > Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 2:05 PM
> > > To: darkroom@ix.netcom.com
> > > Subject: [filmscanners] RE: 3 year wait
> > >
> > >
> > > Since you want to be accurate it  is a 5340 element CCD.
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Austin Franklin [mailto:darkroom@ix.netcom.com]
> > > Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 1:36 PM
> > > To: KAPETAC@polaroid.com
> > > Subject: [filmscanners] RE: 3 year wait
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > <<The ss120 you mentioned, is using the 10K element top of the
> > > > line Kodak CCD.>>>
> > > >
> > > > Does the Sprintscan 4000 Plus use this as well?
> > > >
> > > > Howard
> > >
> > > Hi Howard,
> > >
> > > No.  It uses a 4000 element array.  A 10k array over a 24mm (1")
> > > span would
> > > be 10k ;-)
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Austin
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----------
> ------------
> Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe
> filmscanners'
> or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title
> or body
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----------------------
> Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with
> 'unsubscribe filmscanners'
> or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the
> message title or body

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title
or body

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.