Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

   


   


   















      :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] RE: 3 year wait




> I run film recorder, and in those terms, the "general" resolving
> power of 35mm emulsions is referred to as "4K"...

> "4K" is:
> 4096 x 2731 true pixels (apprx. 32MB TIFF file in 24bit, double
> that for 48bit) which
> 4000ppi at 36x24mm significantly exceeds.

Mac,

What you have described above is obviously 2700 PPI. 4k PPI for something
the size of a 35mm film gives you ~4k x ~6k, or 24M PIXELS, or 72M byte
files...as you say, significantly exceeds that...

Who, on earth, came up with a claim of calling something 2700PPI, "4k", and
what film recorder is it that makes such a claim?

Cripes, can there be more misinformation in an industry?

Austin

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.