ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: 3 year wait



The information on this site:
http://clarkvision.com/imagedetail/scandetail.html
causes me to wonder about this.
-JimD

At 10:32 AM 5/8/02 -0400, Kapetanakis, Constantine wrote:
>At 4000 dpi you are at the edge of film resolution. You get absolutely
>nothing more by scanning at 8000 dpi for example. If you want to print a
>large image just do the resampling in photoshop instead of burdening your
>scanner. Anything higher than 4000 dpi is just marketing hype.


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.