[filmscanners] Re: Re:GRAIN/ICE SHOWDOWN: NikonLS8000vs.MinoltaScanMulti Pro!

["Simon Lamb" <simon@sclamb.com>]

Are you no longer using the SS 120?

Simon

On 13/4/02 8:34 am, "Dave King" <kingphoto@mindspring.com> wrote:

> I took shipment on an LS-8000 today.  As you say Anthony, Nikonscan 3.1.2
> returns an excellent result at default settings, and curves etc are very
> responsive and useful.  8 bit workflow here I come.  The scanner mechanism
> makes reassuring sounds in operation, and seems very solid.  I tested a
> recent E-6 chrome, a recent color neg, and an ancient, terribly faded and
> surface damaged E-6 chrome with ICE and ROC.  The scans from the new film
> were near perfect with much less effort than I'm accustomed to, and the
> restoration of the old chrome was, yes, amazing.  I'm impressed.
>
> Dave
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Anthony Atkielski" <anthony@atkielski.com>
> To: <kingphoto@mindspring.com>
> Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 4:34 PM
> Subject: [filmscanners] Re: Re:GRAIN/ICE SHOWDOWN: Nikon
> LS8000vs.MinoltaScanMulti Pro!
>
>
> Even the early versions I used always produced excellent scans.  The current
> version with an LS-8000ED produces scans that are _almost_ perfect, and
> require virtually no preparation at all ... and it does that without any
> special tweaking of the parameters (I'm pretty much using the defaults at
> the moment).

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body