ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re:GRAIN/ICE SHOWDOWN: Nikon LS8000 vs.MinoltaScanMulti Pro!



On 4/9/02 11:04 PM, "John Sidlo" <jsidlo@bellatlantic.net> wrote:

> I don't have the LS8000, nor am I famiiliar with the Minolta Scan Multi, but
> I do own an LS4000, which I believe is funtionally the same as the LS8000
> (just works with 35mm).

...

> I
> also know that the infrared technique simply does NOT work with straight B/W
> and Kodachrome, although I don't know the exact reason - something to do
> with how the infrared interacts with those kinds of emulsions.  I know that
> when you select the ICE option to scan either straight B/W or Kodachrome,
> you get an unusable result - horribly solarized looking.

The situation is more complicated that that.  I have not done a lot of
Kodachromes on my LS4000, but for those that I have done so far (a few
dozen), the infrared ICE function has worked just fine.

Perhaps the results are related to variations in Kodachrome emulsions (most
of mine are K64 from the early 70s).

--
Julian Vrieslander <julianv@mindspring.com>

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.