ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: X rays was Digital PIC




--- David Hoffman <David@hoffmanphotos.com> wrote:
> Do you have any info as to how we can tell the difference between the
> old fluffy safe machines & these new spiky ones?

That is easy. These new ones are very big. Check out:

http://www.l-3com.com/products_and_services/emerging_commercial_products/index.cfm?section=airport_security_systems

and

http://www.invision-tech.com/products/

In most cases you won't see them (SF is one of a few exceptions) as
they are only used for check-in laguage. They also are too expensive
(approx. $400k - $1M) and too heavy (in some cases need reinforcement
of floors) to use for check-in lugage.
The scanners from L-3 distroy the film more then from InVision. The
scanners from the two companies work a bit different. Nevertheless,
film is not save in InVison's scanners, either.

Rob

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax
http://http://taxes.yahoo.com/

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.