Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 




      :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] RE: Nikon LS-40 vs Polaroid SS4000


LEDs are considered a diffuse light source, as opposed to a point light


> Actually, the Nikon 8000 has a diffuse light source.
> Jack Phipps
> Applied Science Fiction
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Austin Franklin [mailto:darkroom@ix.netcom.com]
> Sent: Friday, March 29, 2002 4:14 AM
> To: Jack Phipps
> Subject: [filmscanners] RE: Nikon LS-40 vs Polaroid SS4000
> > Yes, I have found the above to be true.  While I was testing a
> > Nikon 8000ED,
> > I was totally blown away by how superb ICE worked with that scanner! I
> > currently have the Minolta Scan Multi Pro on which ICE does a
> much poorer
> > job!
> But the Nikon "has" to have ICE to be competitive, as the light source
> exacerbates scratches that would not even appear on a non-LED
> (diffuse light
> source) scanner...
> Austin

Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 


Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.