Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

   


   


   















      :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] RE: Supra for scanning?


  • To: lexa@www.lexa.ru
  • Subject: [filmscanners] RE: Supra for scanning?
  • From: "Vickers, Neal" <VickersN@celrl.org>
  • Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2002 12:26:03 -0500
  • Unsubscribe: mailto:listserver@halftone.co.uk

I've used Supra 100 with a Minolta Scan Dual II, an HP S20, and most
recently on a Canon 2720. I've gotten excellent results with all three with
the 100 speed film. I've haven't used the 400 though. I've also used grain
reduction in Vuescan on some Kodak Gold 800, and Fuji 1600 B&W film and
gotten excellent results.

Neal Vickers
Budget Manager
CEL Regional Library
Savannah Ga

> -----Original Message-----
> From: bobkehl@kvernkehl.com [SMTP:bobkehl@kvernkehl.com]
> Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 12:02 PM
> To:   VickersN@celrl.org
> Subject:      [filmscanners] Re: Supra for scanning?
>
> Hi Tris,
>
> I've been using Supra 100 and 400 for scanning with my Nikon 4000ED, which
> seems to particularly sensitive to grain/grain aliasing.  I've found the
> grain to be more than I desire.  Some members of this list have
> recommended
> slightly overexposing negative film by 1/3 to 1/2 stop.  Other members
> have
> also recommended Superia, especially Reala 100 speed film.  I have just
> ordered some Reala and Provia100F. I hope for some improvement.
>
> What scanner are you using.  This may have some effect on the film you
> select as the best option for low grain/grain aliasing.
>
> Bob Kehl
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Tris Schuler" <tristanjohn@mindspring.com>
> To: <bobkehl@kvernkehl.com>
> Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2002 7:44 PM
> Subject: [filmscanners] Re: Supra for scanning?
>
>
>
> >Hello!
> >
> >On their site, and in their literature, Kodak extols the virtues of
> >Supra for scanning. Does anyone have experience with this film? I like
> >Fuji Superia a lot, but I do get some grain aliasing problems with the
> >400 ISO, and VueScan doesn't have a profile for it <g>!
> >
> >I will shoot a few rolls of Supra this week, but it helps to have
> >others' comparisons with emulsions I may not have seen yet.
> >
> >And then there is always Provia, which I love, but I want to use negs on
> >my next trip.
> >
> >Les
>
> I kind of like the look of Supra. Here's my most recent experience with
> this emulsion, a medium-difficult night scene to catch with regard to
> latitude.
>
> http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=539820
>
> Hope that helps.
>
> Tris
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> --
> ------------
> Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe
> filmscanners'
> or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title
> or body
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> --------------
> Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe
> filmscanners'
> or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title
> or body

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.