ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: Nikon D100



I think what Les is trying to say is that his lens would act like a
"32-65 or whatever" as it would appear on a 35mm field, if it was placed
on a reduced size digital chip.

Art

izzet wrote:

> Well, actually your 18-35 zoom is not turning into anything, it is still
> 18-35 regarding dof, magnification, etc. Only the field of view is
> reduced.
>
> izzet
>
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: filmscanners_owner@halftone.co.uk
>>[mailto:filmscanners_owner@halftone.co.uk] On Behalf Of Les Berkley
>>Sent: Saturday, February 23, 2002 3:54 AM
>>To: izzet@vizo.com
>>Subject: [filmscanners] RE: Nikon D100
>>
>>
>>Hi!
>>
>>I'll settle for 8 MP (maybe...) but they'll have to give me
>>24x36 mm (or
>>close) sensor. I really don't want my 18-35 zoom turning into
>>a 32-65 or whatever...
>>


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.