ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: Supra for scanning?



On Sun, 24 Feb 2002 14:17:50 -0500, you wrote:

>Hello!
>
>On their site, and in their literature, Kodak extols the virtues of
>Supra for scanning. Does anyone have experience with this film? I like
>Fuji Superia a lot, but I do get some grain aliasing problems with the
>400 ISO, and VueScan doesn't have a profile for it <g>!
>
>I will shoot a few rolls of Supra this week, but it helps to have
>others' comparisons with emulsions I may not have seen yet.
>
>And then there is always Provia, which I love, but I want to use negs on
>my next trip.
>


Les - 

I have found Supra to be super for scanning.   100 and 400.  Much
better color match in Vuescan than Superia, which often takes a hell
of a lot of twiddling.  Supra usually comes out very close upon the
first pass.  

I think you'll like it.  
Ken

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.