ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: Nikon D100



Ah didums, will 'oo have to make do with a D60 then? :-)

Canon just didn't want their press release getting out before PMA, but it
seems to have slipped out.

On Friday 22 Feb 2002 1:08 pm, Enoch's Vision, Inc. (Cary Enoch R...) wrote:
>
> I wonder why Canon is lagging so far behind other major manufacturers in
> this area (price/performance, etc.)? Those of us who want to use our
> Canon lenses on an affordable high-res digital body are left out in the
> cold. Anyone dreaming of a Canon digital body with a Foveon chip?

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.