ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: Vuescan 7.4.2 and saving RAW files


  • To: lexa@www.lexa.ru
  • Subject: [filmscanners] Re: Vuescan 7.4.2 and saving RAW files
  • From: "Ned Nurk" <ned_nurk@hotmail.com>
  • Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2002 18:19:37 +0000
  • Unsubscribe: mailto:listserver@halftone.co.uk


as a solution to that, maybe an idea would be to have load/saveable
configurations?

>From: "Bob Shomler" <bob@shomler.com>
>Reply-To: filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
>To: ned_nurk@hotmail.com
>Subject: [filmscanners] Re: Vuescan 7.4.2 and saving RAW files
>Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2002 08:25:49 -0800
>
> >Am I the only one who misses the scan/save performance feature of 7.3.13?
>
>No, you're not alone.  Others have commented on this (also in subject
>thread "Vuescan 7.4: IR cleans raw scan ...").  I really would like to see
>an option for save of unprocessed raw file concurrent with final scan pass,
>as was done in 7.3.13.
>
> >By the way, I am also in the camp that does not want any processing
> >(infrared cleaning or otherwise) applied to RAW files.
>
>This can be done; but it requires more time and effort first to set up
>options to scan from scanner, turn off IR, save raw file and not crop, then
>scan film, then reset options to scan from file, turn on IR and set crop
>file options.  Yes, if one is scanning multiple films one can batch the
>first set then the second set; but it still is more cumbersome and time
>consuming than pre 7.4.
>
>Bob Shomler
>www.shomler.com
>
>
>--------
>At 08:56 AM 1/19/2002 -0500, you wrote:
> >I'm with Wolf on this one.
> >I use an SS4000 at 4,000 dpi most of the time and I am now waiting an
>extra
> >long time to catch a Save. Since my viewer is set to Photoshop as the
> >default viewer, I now must add this to the extra read time for the Tiff
>in
> >Photoshop and I am really waiting a longer time. It isn't impatience,
>it's
> >just that it now takes longer than it used to.
> >Owen
> >
> >Owen P. Evans
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "Wolf Eilers" <weilers@telus.net>
> >Sent: Saturday, January 19, 2002 12:07 AM
> >Subject: [filmscanners] Vuescan 7.4.2 and saving RAW files
> >
> >
> >Recently I sent a note to Ed asking about a performance feature that I
> >believe no longer exists in the 7.4+ versions of VueScan.
> >
> >I stated:
> >
> >In previous releases of VueScan (versions 7.3.7 and up) saving a RAW file
> >was significantly improved by scanning and writing files at the same
>time.
> >With version 7.4 and up this very important feature seems to have been
> >removed. Perhaps the disappearance is because of the enhancement that
> >applies Infrared cleaning and Size reduction filters to RAW files before
> >saving them. However, if Infrared clean is set to None and Size reduction
> >set to 1, then VueScan should still (as it did in the past with version
> >7.3.13) save RAW files while scanning.
> >
> >Ed kindly and promptly replied indicating that the performance should be
>a
> >bit better in 7.4.2. Unfortunately, VueScan 7.4.2 still seems to scan the
> >image, then apply whatever filters are appropriate, then save the RAW
>file
> >to disk. It does this even if all filters are set to none. Saving a large
> >RAW file to disk can take considerable time -- 40 seconds with tif
> >compression on my machine.
> >
> >In contrast, release 7.3.13 of VueScan saves the RAW file to disk
> >synchronously with the scan. When the scan completes, the RAW file is on
>the
> >disk. On my Nikon LS40 with VueScan 7.3.13, I can scan and save a full
> >resolution (2900 dpi) 64 bit RGBI file (59 MB) in 137 seconds. With
>VueScan
> >7.4.2 the time to scan and save is 175 seconds -- an extra 40 seconds.
> >Please note that I set no filters (like infrared cleaning) or size
>reduction
> >to the RAW scan.
> >
> >Am I the only one who misses the scan/save performance feature of 7.3.13?
>By
> >the way, I am also in the camp that does not want any processing
>(infrared
> >cleaning or otherwise) applied to RAW files.
> >
> >Wolf Eilers
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe
>filmscanners'
>or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title
>or body




_________________________________________________________________
Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.