ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] RE: Clipping


  • To: lexa@www.lexa.ru
  • Subject: [filmscanners] RE: Clipping
  • From: "Mike Bloor" <asia@seratel.ie>
  • Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 10:42:07 +0000
  • Unsubscribe: mailto:listserver@halftone.co.uk

At 17:44 08/01/02 +0000, Jawed wrote:
>Some software, unfortunately, makes it hard to tell where the histogram
>ends, if there are very few pixels of a given tonal value.  Photoshop 6 is
>pretty clear.  Paint Shop Pro 6 isn't at all.  Is PSP7 better?

What if the base line of the histogram were a different colour for the
range where there were pixels, even if there were not enough pixels to show
on the histogram plot ?  That way it would be easy to set black and white
points to include everything if you want, or to know if you were omitting
anything.

Over to you Ed.


Mike Bloor

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.