ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: PC memory type for filmscanning (OT - slightly)



---- Original Message -----
From: "Robert Meier" <robert_meier_photo@yahoo.com>



--- Herm <hermperez@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
> After further testing I
> found out that
> the Pentium had substantally faster memory throughput, but the athlon
> was about
> 40% faster in math operations (integer and floating point
> operations).. so
> overall photoshop performance is not fully dependant on memory
> performance..

Actually, I believe the Athlon (XP) is slower when it comes to FP. For
integer is supposed to be much faster, though. So I my conclusion is
that PS uses mainly integer operations. Is this true or am I completely
off here?

You are on track. But some Photoshop benchmarks excel with the P4. It is not
all black & white.

Jim Snyder

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe' in the 
title or body




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.