ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: filmscanners: Re: Nikonscan v VueScan



Yes.  L is quite interesting.  A big move with L gets you funny colours too.
You end up having to balance a contrast change in both the L channel and the
"R, G, B" channel to get colour that doesn't go totally wonky.

Jawed

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
> [mailto:owner-filmscanners@halftone.co.uk]On Behalf Of Maris V. Lidaka,
> Sr.
> Sent: 22 November 2001 17:50
> To: filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
> Subject: Re: filmscanners: Re: Nikonscan v VueScan
>
>
> Have you tried converting to LAB and then adjusting the curve in
> the L channel only?
> See the last section of http://www.ledet.com/margulis/LABCorrection.pdf
>
> Maris
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jawed Ashraf" <Jawed@cupidity.force9.co.uk>
> To: <filmscanners@halftone.co.uk>
> Sent: Thursday, November 22, 2001 4:00 AM
> Subject: RE: filmscanners: Re: Nikonscan v VueScan
>
>
> | Yes I've tried curves of all kinds.  I just wish I hadn't
> pursued the "flat
> | is best" school, because it was a very serious waste of time
> (well, OK, I
> | learnt to reject it).
>
> [remainder snipped]
>
>




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.