Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

   


   


   















      :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: X-ray scanners/etc



Jack,

Well you can get "lead" lined bags and put the film in the checked luggage.
But I am afraid today that might cause them to open the luggage.
I haven't flown since this mess started, but I have been told in the past
that one or two passes through the scanners shouldn't hurt with low speed
film. It is the cumulative effect of many passes that causes the problem.
Jack, I hope your film is OK, please let us know.

John in OKC

 Original Message -----
From: "Jack Phipps" <JPhipps@asf.com>
To: <filmscanners@halftone.co.uk>
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 10:40 AM
Subject: RE: filmscanners: X-ray scanners/etc


| I just got back from NYC in early November. They would not let me have my
| film hand inspected. I begged, pleaded and threatened. The only time I
could
| get it hand inspected was at La Guardia. I had about 15 rolls out of boxes
| in a zip lock. The took each canister out and swabbed it, about 1-2
minutes
| for each. Thirty minutes later, I left with my film. My film went through
| three different x-ray machines. When I changed planes in Kansas City, I
had
| to go through security again.
|
| It is a real nightmare traveling with film through airports. I was told to
| put my film in my checked luggage because it wasn't x-rayed. However,
| sometimes it is and when it is it really gets zapped!
|
| They seem to think that film over 1000 needs special attention as well as
| medical and professional film (I pointed out that the film was
professional,
| but they ignored me). You might try getting some 1600 film and putting it
in
| with your other film or somehow document that the film is
| professional/medical/special.
|
| I hope your experience is better than mine.
|
| Jack
|
| -----Original Message-----
| From: JackG [mailto:jackg@poboxes.com]
| Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 9:49 AM
| To: filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
| Subject: filmscanners: X-ray scanners/etc
|
|
| I have been notified by my Professional lab and the Professional
| Photographers of America not to send processed or unprocessed film through
| the US mail due to the new equipment they are using.
|
| Its is best to have all film, "hand inspected". rather than go through the
| machines. I understand now that it is best to have it out of the plastic
| containers and in a clear "Ziploc" bag so they can see it.
|
| It kind of makes you wonder what it is doing to our bodies. :)
|
| John in OKC
| ----- Original Message -----
| From: "Rob Geraghty" <harper@wordweb.com>
| To: <filmscanners@halftone.co.uk>
| Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 7:45 AM
| Subject: Re: filmscanners: Color Negative Film Poll
|
|
| | > > I'm leaving for my vacation soon, and although I'd like to evaluate
my
| | > > camera equipment against various films, film processing and digital
| | > > post-processing, there's really no time.
| |
| | Something else comes to mind - given the current paranoia in the world,
| you
| | probably want to try to process the film in situ if you have to go
through
| | baggage checks.  High speed film especially may suffer if the X-ray
| scanners
| | are pumped up as high as they can go.  Carry the film in hand luggage -
I
| | think we dicussed this on the list before?
| |
| | Rob
| |
| |




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.