Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 




      :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: Canon 4000 scanner VS Nikon LS4000 >Mikael

Its the same problem with my 2 scanners ls2000 and Ls 4000 regarding 
sharpness/ dept of  field problem.
If you are pleased with your Ls2000 stay with it and wait and se what's
coming. The difference between LS2000 and a extrapol. picture from 2700ppi 
up to 4000 ppi and real 4000 ppi from Ls 4000 are not huge. In fact I have 
done some test pictures and asked other photographers which one are a 
2700ppi picture from the beginning. No one could se and tell for sure the 
difference from the 2 scanners, Fuji 100ISO  slide film and 30 x 40 cm 
copies . The noice is lower and colors are better in LS4000 than LS2000.
Best regards
Mikael Risedal

>From: Julian Robinson <jrobinso@pcug.org.au>
>Reply-To: filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
>To: filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
>Subject: Re: filmscanners: Canon 4000 scanner VS Nikon LS4000 >Mikael
>Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2001 17:30:16 +1100
>Mikael - can you tell me which is best or worse out of the LS2000 and 4000
>re focus problem?  IF the 4000 is the same as the 2000, I know I can cope
>and more or less how to handle the problem - if it is worse I know I should
>not buy a 4000 to replace my 2000.
>At 11:01 16/11/01, Mikael wrote:
>>. Im a owner of 2 Nikon scanner LS2000 and LS 4000, they have the same

Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp


Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.