Its the same problem with my 2 scanners ls2000 and Ls 4000 regarding
sharpness/ dept of field problem.
If you are pleased with your Ls2000 stay with it and wait and se what's
coming. The difference between LS2000 and a extrapol. picture from 2700ppi
up to 4000 ppi and real 4000 ppi from Ls 4000 are not huge. In fact I have
done some test pictures and asked other photographers which one are a
2700ppi picture from the beginning. No one could se and tell for sure the
difference from the 2 scanners, Fuji 100ISO slide film and 30 x 40 cm
copies . The noice is lower and colors are better in LS4000 than LS2000.
>From: Julian Robinson <email@example.com>
>Subject: Re: filmscanners: Canon 4000 scanner VS Nikon LS4000 >Mikael
>Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2001 17:30:16 +1100
>Mikael - can you tell me which is best or worse out of the LS2000 and 4000
>re focus problem? IF the 4000 is the same as the 2000, I know I can cope
>and more or less how to handle the problem - if it is worse I know I should
>not buy a 4000 to replace my 2000.
>At 11:01 16/11/01, Mikael wrote:
>>. Im a owner of 2 Nikon scanner LS2000 and LS 4000, they have the same
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp