Re: filmscanners: Canon 4000 scanner VS Nikon LS4000

["Brian D. Plikaytis" <bdplikaytis@bellsouth.net>]

Maybe I'm not looking at the images correctly but the _entire_ Nikon 4000
frame looks out of focus. Is this a fair test - to compare an out-of-focus
Nikon scan to an in-focus Canon scan?

Brian
--------------------------------------------------------------
respond to bdplikaytis@bellsouth.net


----- Original Message -----
From: "Mikael Risedal" <risedal@hotmail.com>
To: <filmscanners@halftone.co.uk>
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 4:29 PM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Canon 4000 scanner VS Nikon LS4000


>
> To illustrate what I mean with poor Nikon Ls 4000 sharpness, I have
> put a attachment with a jpg file. Vuescan as a reference sofware and same
> settings to the 2 scanners
>
>
>
> >Nikon Ls 4000 can not produce equal  sharpness over the whole film area
if
> >the film are mounted glass less or in a filmstrip. Lack of depth of
field.
> >
> >The test shows that a combination of Canons  sharpness and Nikons
scanning
> >speed, colors and Dmax should be a nearly perfect  mid end scanner.
> >
> >Mikael Risedal
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >_________________________________________________________________
> >Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at
http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
> >
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
>