Filmscanners mailing list archive (firstname.lastname@example.org)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: filmscanners: pixels, printer dots, etc
> > why do you believe "the software has to resample" when creating
> > a dither pattern?
> Last Q 1st ... If the res of your image is (e.g.) 300PPI, and
> you indicate
> "draft", "good" or "best", then there needs to be some translation. If
> there is a printer specific optimum resolution associated with the mode I
> would assume the printer software would need to resample.
I don't believe it's really resampling, which is a specific operation...I
just think it takes data and derives at the dither pattern without any
> This is all that is necessary for recognizing Epson resampling
> (1) Create a 180PPI square image (gray, RGB) with almost vertical and
> horizontal solid 1 pixel black on white lines.
I have had this discussion before...and using lines to test this isn't
really a valid test IMO. Yes it shows "something", but what it shows is
only valid for lines, not for real photographic images.
> Lastly I'll grant you ... this is NOT a "photographic" image, and it is
> doubtful you or I would ever be able to point to a resampling
> artifact in an
> actual printed photographic image ...
Oh, good man!
> but I think you'll admit
> after testing
> they must be there.
BTDT (been there, done that)...yes, I'll keep it in mind the next time I
print perfect squares ;-)