Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

   


   


   















      :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: filmscanners: Best solution for HD and images



>With two disks, you would be correct; but in this case, the two disks are
>going to act as one, so both must be set to be masters.

Right, but they are on separate IDE channels (channels 3 & 4) if I am
understanding things correctly which is what lets them read and right
simultaneously in parallel which is not the case if they were both on the
same channel.  I also do not think it is possible to have to master drives
on the same channel so you cannot have the jumpers on both drives set for
master drive if they are connected to the same cable and channel.  The same
RAID array using two IDE channels maybe.  Am I understanding things
correctly?


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
[mailto:owner-filmscanners@halftone.co.uk]On Behalf Of Jim Snyder
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 7:50 PM
To: filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Best solution for HD and images


on 11/12/01 10:34 PM, LAURIE SOLOMON at LAURIE@advancenet.net wrote:

>> Actually, both must be set up on the same IDE channel as masters.
>
> How does one do that?  I thought that you could only have one master
device
> per channel; and it was the one that was connected to the end of the
ribbon
> cable and had its jumper set for master.
>
With two disks, you would be correct; but in this case, the two disks are
going to act as one, so both must be set to be masters.

Jim Snyder




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.