ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: filmscanners: Best solution for HD and images




> The RAID 0 is taking half
> the data and
> pushing it to one hard drive, and the other half to the second,
> giving you a
> slight edge in speed since the bus to each hard drive can be loaded while
> the other hard drive is munching on the data it just received.

Not if implemented correctly.  If done right, RAID 0 will get all disks
worth of data in parallel (up to a certain point, depending on SCSI level,
media transfer rate and system bus at a minimum)...since the media transfer
rate of the disks is far less than the SCSI bus and the PCI (if used) bus.
There is really no "munching", it's purely reading (or writing) an entire
file...before any real "munching" is done.




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.