Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 




      :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: filmscanners: Website ref. re - Pixels per inch vs DPI

Paul, I understand your frustration from his test setup but camera body
wouldn't mind a lot.
You obviously meant lens not to be adequate for such kind of comparisons,
right ?
Though not being Canon user, I still think that Elan would suit the test but
the equipped with pro-quality optics.

Alex Z

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
[mailto:owner-filmscanners@halftone.co.uk]On Behalf Of Paul Graham
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 10:06 PM
To: filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Website ref. re - Pixels per inch vs DPI

well thats an astonishing amount of work on this site, and very interesting
but what dropped my jaw was that he did the tests on a
Canon Elan with a Canon 28-105mm lens
to judge the quality of 35mm vs 5x4" (among other things) with this is
plainly ridiculous
I'm not trying to be a snob here, but really, you gotta get hold of a good
pro 35mm camera before doing such tests,




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.