Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

   


   


   















      :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: filmscanners: Website ref. re - Pixels per inch vs DPI



Paul, I understand your frustration from his test setup but camera body
wouldn't mind a lot.
You obviously meant lens not to be adequate for such kind of comparisons,
right ?
Though not being Canon user, I still think that Elan would suit the test but
the equipped with pro-quality optics.

Regards,
Alex Z

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
[mailto:owner-filmscanners@halftone.co.uk]On Behalf Of Paul Graham
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 10:06 PM
To: filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Website ref. re - Pixels per inch vs DPI


well thats an astonishing amount of work on this site, and very interesting
reading,
but what dropped my jaw was that he did the tests on a
Canon Elan with a Canon 28-105mm lens
to judge the quality of 35mm vs 5x4" (among other things) with this is
plainly ridiculous
I'm not trying to be a snob here, but really, you gotta get hold of a good
pro 35mm camera before doing such tests,

paul

http://www.users.qwest.net/~rnclark/scandetail.htm





 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.