Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

   


   


   















      :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: filmscanners: Website ref. re - Pixels per inch vs DPI



I do agree with regard to the comparison with the 4x5", yet the fact that
the lens is not the best available gives even more emphasis to the visible
difference between scans at various dpi. After all, had these tests been
made with a 3.000$ Leica lens, a lot of people would be left wondering
whether the results would apply also to their lenses.

Alessandro Pardi

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Graham [mailto:peegee@btinternet.com]
> Sent: marted 30 ottobre 2001 21.06
> To: filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
> Subject: RE: filmscanners: Website ref. re - Pixels per inch vs DPI
> 
> 
> well thats an astonishing amount of work on this site, and 
> very interesting
> reading,
> but what dropped my jaw was that he did the tests on a
> Canon Elan with a Canon 28-105mm lens
> to judge the quality of 35mm vs 5x4" (among other things) with this is
> plainly ridiculous
> I'm not trying to be a snob here, but really, you gotta get 
> hold of a good
> pro 35mm camera before doing such tests,
> 
> paul
> 
> http://www.users.qwest.net/~rnclark/scandetail.htm
> 




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.