Lexa Software: Filmscanners@halftone.co.uk archive

		Apache-Talk @lexa.ru
		Inet-Admins @info.east.ru
		Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk
		Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru
		nginx-ru @sysoev.ru

СТАТЬИ

ПЕРСОНАЛЬНОЕ

ПРОГРАММЫ

ПИШИТЕ
ПИСЬМА

АРХИВ :: Filmscanners

Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

filmscanners: Re: filmscanners: RE: filmscanners: Pixels per inch vs DPI

To: filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
Subject: filmscanners: Re: filmscanners: RE: filmscanners: Pixels per inch vs DPI
From: Rob Geraghty <harper@wordweb.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2001 14:16:25 +1000
In-reply-to: <3BDCC6F9.D32FBEAA@bway.net>
List-help: <mailto:majordomo@lists.cix.co.uk> 'help' as msg. text
Mailing-list: filmscanners; contact: owner-filmscanners@halftone.co.uk

Harvey wrote:
> I agree about the eventually part....but not yet.
> I am talking about what is now, not what is theoretically
>possible, and probable.  We essentially, are in agreement.

I think so. :)

Rob


Rob Geraghty harper@wordweb.com
http://wordweb.com

References:
- Re: filmscanners: RE: filmscanners: Pixels per inch vs DPI
  - From: SKID Photography <skid@bway.net>

Prev by Date: filmscanners: RE: filmscanners: Yet Another VueScan Question
Next by Date: filmscanners: RE: filmscanners: RE: filmscanners: RE: filmscanners: Pixels per inch vs DPI
Previous by thread: Re: filmscanners: RE: filmscanners: Pixels per inch vs DPI
Next by thread: Re: filmscanners: RE: filmscanners: Pixels per inch vs DPI
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread