Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 




      :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: filmscanners: RE: filmscanners: Pixels per inch vs DPI

> "Austin Franklin" <darkroom@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> > > How is a randomly sized and shaped dye cloud a useful
> characteristic of
> > > shape and position?  How is it more useful than a precise
> position in an
> > > array?
> > Because it is.  It's the way the world works.  It IS additional
> information,
> > plain and simple.  Usefulness is a completely different issue, but it is
> > ALSO useful, to a point.
> I don't think there's any point in my responding to an argument like this.

That's the point, it isn't an argument!  It's like asking why the number 9
is larger than the number 4.  It's just the way it is.  It's just a fact of
simple physics that a pixel does not contain near the same amount of
information as a dye cloud.


Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.