Filmscanners mailing list archive (email@example.com)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: filmscanners: RE: filmscanners: Pixels per inch vs DPI
> "Austin Franklin" <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > > How is a randomly sized and shaped dye cloud a useful
> characteristic of
> > > shape and position? How is it more useful than a precise
> position in an
> > > array?
> > Because it is. It's the way the world works. It IS additional
> > plain and simple. Usefulness is a completely different issue, but it is
> > ALSO useful, to a point.
> I don't think there's any point in my responding to an argument like this.
That's the point, it isn't an argument! It's like asking why the number 9
is larger than the number 4. It's just the way it is. It's just a fact of
simple physics that a pixel does not contain near the same amount of
information as a dye cloud.