Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: filmscanners: Minolta Scan Multi Pro REVIEW???
Yes, in big companies like Minolta they often don´t know very much about
what´s going on - they are paid anyway :-(
BTW, I have re- studied the sample scans of the Minolta and the Nikon 8000
on imaging- resource, and unfortunately I have come to the conclusion that
the Nikon ist the better scanner in almost every respect: Scans are clearer
(Minolta has like a veil over them) and show definitely less noise in the
shadow regions. Look especially at the "old train slide" which is the killer
slide for a scanner....
If I will decide to get a MF scanner (so muc money for a non- professional)
I will most likely go for the Nikon then... The Polaroid is cheaper, but no
ICE, unsecure future....
greetings Bernhard
----- Original Message -----
From: "david soderman" <scapes@wi.net>
To: <filmscanners@halftone.co.uk>
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 3:10 AM
Subject: filmscanners: Minolta Scan Multi Pro REVIEW???
> Thank you to Bernhard Ess and Victor Landweber for the URL on the Minolta
> review!
>
> Just thought you might be interested to know that you both know more than
> Minolta does!
> I called Minolta and spoke to a fellow in digital imaging. He knew
nothing
> about any available reviews on the Scan Multi Pro. Also, he said there is
> no available information re: estimated shipping on the units.
|
