Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

   


   


   















      :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

filmscanners: Re: filmscanners: ReSize, ReSample or ReScan ?



Art wrote:
>Common wisdom is that scanning at the highest optical resolution and
>then downsampling via a good program provides better results.

I've found in the past that scanning at a resolution which produces an image
on the screen close to the required size means you can get a sharper jpeg
for web use than scanning at maximum res and resampling.  I suggested as
much in this list, but got shouted down.  My recent experience has been
that resampling always means I have to sharpen afterwards.  As Art suggests
- try both and see what works for you.

Rob


Rob Geraghty harper@wordweb.com
http://wordweb.com






 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.