Filmscanners mailing list archive (email@example.com)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: filmscanners: Nikon Scan & VS Negative dynamic range
> > That is just not true. F-stops are relative to the film, NOT to the
> > scanner. You can expand the exposure range on the film through
> > and
> > development.
> PLEASE read the archives. You can express the range DMin-Dmax as F-stops,
> or as a log value (1 stop=~0.3)
> Tony Sleep
Tony, perhaps you are not understanding my point. The number of stops you
captured on film had NO relationship to the dynamic range of the scanner.
That's basic. I can have the EXACT same dynamic range in the scanner, yet
have one film/exposure/development that covers 5 f-stops, and one
film/exposure/development that covers 7 f-stops. This is because the film
it self will both have the same dMin and dMax, but will contain more/less
I completely understand the relation between f-stops and dynamic range, but
I believe it is erroneous and misleading to express the dynamic range of a
scanner in f-stops.