Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

   


   


   















      :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: Re: Emulsion flaws (was dust in SS4000)



Hi Roger et al,
Interestingly enough, my best scans are from Provia 100F and 400F. I scanned
a few old Kodachrome 64 & 25's this afternoon and given their age (decades )
they weren't too bad. Compared to some recent Provia scans, they looked like
that ashtray's contents had fallen on them. Furthermore, when I spoke about
the micro-cracks I should have also included that I think airborne
particulate matter and fungal spores and any living organism can get into
the film layers. Perhaps pollution levels are the culprits here??
As a coincidence, Roger; I see your address at UNB and I know a Roger Smith
in the Chem. Dept. at Mt. Allison. Are you working at both campuses?
Regards,
Owen

----- Original Message -----
From: "Roger Smith" <rsmith@unb.ca>
To: <filmscanners@halftone.co.uk>
Sent: Saturday, September 22, 2001 3:44 PM
Subject: filmscanners: Re: Emulsion flaws (was dust in SS4000)


> Another interesting take on the "emulsion bubble" phenomenon.
> I recently compared a few rolls of Fuji Provia 100F and Kodak Elite
> Chrome 100. Each of the pairs of film was shot with the same lens and





 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.